[About Thrombotix]

Click on the titles to expand the section...

Introduction

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and will occur in 700,000 Americans this year, of these 700,000, over 163,000 of them will die. Ischemic stroke is when a blood clot, called a thrombus, blocks blood in a cerebral artery from entering the brain causing brain cells to die. Ischemic stroke is the most common type of stroke and accounts for 85% of all strokes. Time is very important when treating a stroke since every second that passes, 32,000 brain cells die. Treatments of ischemic stroke include pharmacologic thrombolysis (intravenous drugs that dissolve blood clots) and mechanical thrombectomy (removing the clot mechanically).

Objective

The objective of this project is to design a MEMS (microelectromechanical system) device to mechanically remove or break apart a blood clot in the cerebral artery in stroke patients. The device will need to completely relieve the effects of the stroke and replenish blood to the brain in a small amount of time. A macro scale prototype of the device will be built and demonstrated in an in vitro model.

Impact & Significance

Considering the medical arena we have entered with the commencement of this project, the impact of it directly depends on the efficiency of our process. The removal of blood clots from a patient’s artery could be a life or death situation. With the current method of injecting tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) to dissolve blood clots, the probability of recurrence makes it a short term solution with negative long term effects. Our device aims to provide a more complete treatment and reduce the recurrence rate while limiting vessel damage for our patients. The fact that our device can be used in a proactive process (rather than waiting for a removing agent to do the work) makes it all the more significant.

Existing Products

The MERCI (Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia) retrieval system is the only device approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) as a treatment for ischemic stroke. The device is introduced into the body using a catheter and navigated though blood vessels to the brain. The end of the device is fitted with a corkscrew where it can be driven though the clot and mechanically remove it. A recent study with the device showed success in 48% of patients where just the device alone was used and the success rate increased to 60% when the device was used in combination with drug therapy.

Pros:
− The device was approved by the Food & Drug Administration
− 48% recanalization rate from the device alone
− 60% recanalization rate from the device with adjuvant therapy
− 28% mortality rate with a Rankin score of 2
Cons:
− Overall mortality rate of 44%



click thumbnail for enlarged photo
AngioJet System
The AngioJet system is a device that uses saline jets directed back into the catheter to create a low pressure zone at the end of the device to essentially vacuum the clot to remove it from the body. However the system was designed to remove clots from other arteries other than from the brain.

Pros:
− The clot burden was reduced in all patients
− Stenosis was less than 50% of vascular diameter

Cons:
− In previous trials, clinical results were poor due to poor collateral flow.
− Three vessel perforations occurred with subarachnoid hemorrhage


click thumbnail for enlarged photo
Endovascular Photo Acoustic Recanalization Laser
The endovascular photo acoustic recanalization (EPAR) laser directs laser energy to the clot where it is absorbed and converted to acoustic energy. The clot is then broken up into small globules by the tip of the device. Clinical trials showed success in 44% of patients were the device was used in conjunction with drug therapy, but only a 15% success rate were the device was used alone. Currently, lack of funding has stopped any further clinical trials.

Pros:
− Recanalization occurred in 44% of the people in its trial
− The device showed acceptable safety criteria when in operation

Cons:
− 38% mortality rate
− Recanalization occurred 15% of the time solely with this device
− If performed improperly, this device could cause fatal vascular rupture


click thumbnail for enlarged photo

EKOS Ultrasound Device
The EKOS ultrasound device uses a small ultrasound transducer at the tip of the device in combination with drug therapy to dissolve the clot. The ultrasound waves increase the permeability of the clot in order to speed up the effects of the drugs. Clinical trials of this device are currently ongoing, preliminary results show that complete breakdown of the clot takes an average of 46 minutes.

Pros:
− Average time for recanalization was 46 minutes
− TIMI grade 2-3 flow was attained in 57% patients in the first hour.

Cons:
− Device was used in conjunction with tPA


click thumbnail for enlarged photo
Latis Laser Device
Latis Laser Device The Latis laser device uses a laser at its tip to heat the clot to the point where it would breakdown. However, clinical trials showed that surgeons were unable to successfully get the device to the brain and further trials were abandoned.

Pros:
− A patient can receive treatment in up to eight hours in comparison to two or three hours
Cons:
− Of the first five patients included in the initial trial, two could not have the device delivered to clot site.

Innovative Ideas/Conceptual Designs

With previous research on existing designs and their pros/cons, certain criteria were necessary in developing conceptual designs. One significant consideration was the nature of a blood clot. A blood clot is composed of platelets that exist within blood and has a viscous consistency. Although it blocks the passage way of blood, it does not have a solid form that is easily grasped. Putting this into consideration, various designs were constructed. All the devices would be accompanied by a guide wire which would be directed by a surgeon through a patient via external controls. The location of the device would be monitored via CAT scan.


click thumbnail for enlarged photo

One design was an “umbrella” like device designed to capture the clot and remove it from the body. The device would initially be collapsed and enclosed by a tip. The surgeon would guide the tip past the clot. Once the device was properly placed, the “umbrella” would inflate, creating a scoop which could then be redirected out the body.
Another design designated for removal is the “jaw” device. Its design is comprised of a clamp-like mechanism which encloses the clot within itself. The device would prevent the mass from escape. The surgeon could then pull out the clot via the path entered with the aid of the guide wire.


click thumbnail for enlarged photo

One more consideration made for removal was a “tree” design. The concept behind the design was to have multiple levels of wire orientated in different directions. Ideally the clot would be engrossed within the matrix of the tree and thereby able to be removed from the body.



click thumbnail for enlarged photo

Another form of treatment is to break up the blood clot into particles minute enough to reenter the bloodstream and no longer prove harmful. A viable option is to use a vacuum strainer; the concept behind this would be to strain the blood clot through a micro-mesh or push the clot through a small opening. To do this, there would need to be some type of encapsulated tip that would be able to push and/or pull the clot through the strain/hole using some type of vacuum.

Applying the same principle of breakdown, a method that would use an active-tip is also a plausible option. This method would involve using minimal vibration induced from an active-tip. At proper frequencies, the tip would be able to induce breakdown of the clot.

This idea was further developed to use multiple tips. At certain frequencies the fingers are enticed to move and at times will collide. This collision will provide for a “chomping” motion which would in turn destroy the clot.

A similar method would be using a bristle device. This device would encompass closely to the walls of the blood vessel rotating within the clot and thereby breaking it down. This concept is closely related to a street cleaning brush.

Criteria for Conceptual Design Comparison

Several factors need to be considered in the selection of the final design. The most important area of concern is in minimizing further damage. This provides to major concerns. Does the product have potential to affect the blood flow and/or does the product have the potential of damaging the vessel wall? The effect on blood flow is seen in devices designed to remove clots to outside the body (i.e. The MERCI Device). The potential damage to vessel walls is present in devices that have moving parts that are very near to the vessel walls. Other criteria include ease of use, cost to manufacture, durability, and the ability to be used in various sized vessels. The ease of use is concerned with how easy the device is to use and if any additional training is needed to operate. Cost is of vital importance to ensure that as many patients as possible could benefit from the design’s advantages. Durability is also an important factor because any type of damage to the device has the potential to harm the patient. Also, there is the consideration of using the device in various sized vessels. This would reduce costs to both manufacturing and consumer.

Selection of the Conceptual Design and Expected Performance Specification


click thumbnail for enlarged photo

According to the concept matrix, the vacuum strainer design and the multiple finger vibrating tips had the most positive outcome. We decided that minimizing further damage meant having the least effect on blood flow and the vacuum strainer and vibrating fingers will have the least effect because they would work from within the thrombus, leaving the flow of blood unobstructed. The conceptual design leaves room for the device to work in vessels of any size, unlike many of the other designs like the jaw-clamp or umbrella scoop. The ease of use is another area in which these two designs have an advantage. Unlike other designs, these concepts would require no extra training to operate effectively once they have arrived at the site of the thrombus. Other devices would have required a fine tuned expertise to operate safely and efficiently. Current trials have proven that removal is very inefficient and can actually lead to recurrence and possibly fatal effects.

Further consultation was performed with the aid of our advisor determining what other characteristics to consider in making a final selection. The final design chosen was the multiple vibrating tips. This provided a more feasible design and one that would not require an excess of parts. The multiple vibrating tips device conceptually would be designed so that the tips would be moved at a certain frequency so that collision would occur between them. This collision would cause for a break in the bonds of the blood clot thereby destroying the thrombus to the point where it can be reconstituted back into the blood stream without any further damage.

Certain specifications were necessary to be considered firstly that being of size. The average blood vessel within the brain is 2-3mm in diameter. As stated in the objective, this is a size too small to be dealt with average mechanical devices and therefore would require a MEMS device. Unfortunately this is unfeasible with our budget and capabilities, and rather a macro scale model would prove our concepts in a 10mm diameter scenario (likely in the form of a test tube/vial). Another consideration is material. The device is intended to be placed within the body and therefore requires a biocompatible material. Also, the different type of material affects the frequency required to excite the fingers in order to make them collide. With these in mind, a technical analysis was performed to decide the optimal design for our device.

Functional Requirements

There are several risks in the devices on the market that Thrombotix will alleviate. Instead of restricting the blood flow in order to remove the blood clot, the device will function without having to stop the flow of blood to the clot site. Restricting the blood flow increases the risk of damage to the blood vessel and, in the event of a blood clot located in the brain, brain damage. By having a device that can function with blood flowing around the site this eliminates the risk of future complications as a result of the procedure.

Loose blood clots can cause serious medical problems for the individual. If they clot is broken down into small enough pieces, the platelets that comprise the clot will reconstitute into the blood stream, essentially eliminating their risk to the person. By focusing on destroying the clot instead of removal, the device limits the chance of a clot coming loose and flowing freely through the vessel. It also limits the medical waste created that would need to be disposed of properly.

A big part of fragmenting the clot into miniscule pieces revolves around the vibrating of the fingers. Our device contains three fingers that are designed vibrate at the frequency of the blood clot. A piezoelectric actuator will be the driving force behind the movement of the fingers. The selection of the actuator has been a challenge for us especially considering the size constraints of our project.

System Parameters


A piezoelectric material is one that converts electrical energy into mechanical energy or the other way around. We selected a piezoelectric actuator to perform the vibrations in our project for many reasons. These actuators can be made to fit our small device size and will vibrate at the frequencies needed to allow the fingers to do their jobs. Piezoelectric actuators do not have any physical moving parts which make them ideal for our design because the less moving parts the less likely for our design to break or get tangled up in its environment.

After researching the piezoelectric actuators themselves and looking at their specifications we began to wonder how we would actually operate one. Further investigation showed that there are a few circuit design methods that could drive the actuator. Piezoelectric actuators demand large voltage changes that usually range around -150V to 150V or -200V to 200V. One way to design this circuit would be to use one amplifier, but because of the peak to peak voltage of approximately 300V this would have to be a specially made component that would cost upwards of $100 dollars. Since part of this project is working with a strict budget we searched of another option. Another option would be to design a circuit that consists of a small-signal amplifier followed up by level shifting. If we decided to take this route it would force us to do long calculations in order to determine all individual components needed in the circuit. The nature of this project also involves a time constraint which makes this method unusable. Next, we found a circuit which uses two high-speed, high-voltage, low current MOSFET op-amps. These op-amps are only $15 each which is significantly lower than any of the other options and will work just as well.

click thumbnail for enlarged photo

The op-amps used in the circuit above are monolithic PA78’s. The initial input is shown on the left as being a 15V p-p 80kHz sine wave. A circuit such as this one will produce the following wave forms below. Graph (a) shows the output of amplifier A, graph (b) shows the output of amplifier B, and graph (c) shows the voltage acting on the amplifier. We plan on understanding how each component works in detail so we can modify it to make it our own.


click thumbnail for enlarged photo

Design Constraints

Considering a project like this on the micro level scale, we’ve encountered several design constraints that prohibit us from following through with some of our past initial designs. The first design restraint we acknowledged was the size and the cost associated. As you know, the smaller the components the more expensive they can be. Due to the micro scale of human blood vessels (commonly 2-3mm in diameter), we are forced to work with a vessel macro model scale of 1cm in diameter. Our entire device will have to be less than 1cm in diameter with room to move around without irritating vessel walls.

Although our macro model will obviously not be tested in a human, we still plan on using medical grade material to properly simulate the procedure. The fingers of our device will be composed of nickel titanium (NiTi) also known as nitinol. We chose nitinol because of its properties of elasticity. When the base of the fingers is being vibrated the tips bend and whip around frantically. These elastic properties allow the fingers to return to their original position and shape when the device is turned off. Nitinol also assures that no pieces or tips of the fingers will break off after prolonged vibrations. This is possible because of its lack of plastic deformation.

We also need to be concerned with the properties of the environment that we will be working in. We need to make sure that our actuators and sensors will be able to function essentially in an underwater environment. We need to make sure that any current and/or voltage being used to power our equipment will not be exposed to the patient’s body causing them harm.

Technical Analysis

The design of device is comprised of three vibrated "fingers" to break up the clot and restore blood supply to the brain. With this said, a lot of design consideration was done on the shape and material of the fingers. It is important to have a geometry and material that will provide low modal frequencies and large deformations. A modal frequency is the vibration point where the finger will experience its maximum deflection. It is better for the mode frequencies to be low because it will be easier to find and operate an actuator that can vibrate at the frequency. An analysis was done on different finger geometries in ANSYS 11.0 software using titanium as a material in all designs. The following are results of iterations done with different geometries.

Table 1: Modes for Blocks
Name
X (mm)
Y (mm)
L (mm)
1st Mode (Hz)
2nd Mode (Hz)
3rd Mode (Hz)
4th Mode (Hz)
Geometry1
0.5
0.5
3
53270
53550
0.30452E+06
0.30999E+06
Geometry2
0.5
1
3
57722
91039
0.27351E+06
0.33008E+06
Geometry3
0.5
0.5
4
34790
37276
0.20414E+06
0.22488E+06
Geometry4
0.5
0.5
5
24732
27101
0.13462E+06
0.15850E+06
Geometry5
0.5
0.5
10
6777.9
7950.1
41322
46672
Geometry10
1
1
10
12366
13550
67303
79227


Figure 1: Block Geometry

Table 2: Modes for Cylinders
Name
Dia (mm)
Len (mm)
1st Mode (Hz)
2nd Mode (Hz)
3rd Mode (Hz)
4th Mode (Hz)
Geometry6
0.5
3
39186
39187
0.22545E+06
0.22545E+06
Geometry7
0.5
5
14201
14202
0.86100E+05
0.86108E+05
Geometry15
0.5
10
3557.8
3558
0.22107E+05
0.22109E+05
Geometry16
0.5
12
2473.7
2474
15412
15415


Table 3: Modes for Wide End
Name
X,Y (mm)
Z (mm)
N (mm)
1st Mode (Hz)
2nd Mode (Hz)
3rd Mode (Hz)
4th Mode (Hz)
Geometry8
0.5
10
1
6391.7
6843.8
42687
46123
Geometry9
0.5
10
2
5727.3
6462.4
43183
44892
Geometry11
0.5
10
5
5239.5
5766.6
40266
42972
Geometry12
0.5
10
8
5232.4
6275.5
43535
51744


Figure 2: Wide End Geometry

Table 4: Modes for Large End
Name
A1,B1 (mm)
A2,B2 (mm)
Z (mm)
N (mm)
1st Mode (Hz)
2nd Mode (Hz)
3rd Mode (Hz)
4th Mode (Hz)
Geometry13
0.5
1
10
5
3700.8
4156.8
35725
36487


Figure 3: Large End - Geometry 13

Table 5: Modes for Geometry 14
Name
1st Mode (Hz)
2nd Mode (Hz)
3rd Mode (Hz)
4th Mode (Hz)
Geometry14
3961.3
4022.9
26928
28483


Figure 3: Large End - Geometry 13

From all the previous data, the lowest frequencies came from fingers with cylinder geometry, in particular, geometry16. The next variable that needed to be determined is the material type for the fingers. It is important to also have a material that will support a low modal frequency and can be easily fabricated into a cylindrical shape. The following metallic materials were considered for analysis because they are readily available in wire form: high carbon steel, stainless steel, aluminum, and carbon steel. The following test assembly was built in Solidworks 2006 software with each material and a model analysis was done using ANSYS Workbench. Only the fingers in the test assembly were material tested, the base of the assembly was fixed at titanium alloy.

Table 6: Properties of materials
Name
Size (in)
Density (kg/m)
Modulus of Elasticity (GPa)
Poissons Ratio
Source
High Carbon Steel
0.02
7850
210
0.313
MSC
Stainless Steel
0.02
8000
93
0.3
MSC
Aluminum
0.02
2710
68.9
0.33
McMaster Carr
Carbon Steel
0.023
7872
200
0.29
McMaster Carr


click thumbnail for enlarged photo


Table 7: Results of material testing
Material
1st Mode (Hz)
2nd Mode (Hz)
High Carbon Steel
1800
1800.1
Stainless Steel
1187.9
1188
Aluminum
1757.8
1758
Carbon Steel
1753.9
1754.1

From the results of the material testing, it can be seen that the lowest frequencies were yielded by the stainless steel material. The highest frequencies were experienced from the high carbon steel material. Since this is a three finger design, two fingers will be parallel with one finger offset in between them as shown in figure 8. It would be optimal if the two parallel fingers were excited and swept the blood clot across the middle one to break up the clot. With that said, the design should utilize both the high carbon steel and stainless steel to achieve this action due to the large difference in modal frequencies. Next, a material needed to be chosen as the base for the fingers. For the block, the material should be metallic, easily machined, relatively inexpensive, and readily available in block form. Table 8shows attributes for readily available metals in block form.

Table 8: Properties of test block material
Material
Machinability
Size (in)
Density (kg/m)
Modulus (GPa)
Poissons Ratio
Price ($)
Aluminum 2024
Good
2 x 2 x 2
2780
73
0.33
31.00
Steel 12L14
Excellent
2 x 2 x 12
7870
200
0.29
49.59

The next test assembly was modeled with one stainless steel finger and two high carbon steel fingers attached to a block made of each of the test materials. The results of the tests can be found in Table 9.

Table 9: Test results for base materials
Material
1st Mode (Hz)
2nd Mode (Hz)
Aluminum 2024
1651.7
1651.8
Steel 12L14
1653.2
1653.2

The results show that the materials are very similar and should both be considered for the final design. The last step of the technical analysis is to test the final designs for deformation though a harmonic analysis and determine an actuator. From all the tests so far the final design should include the following:

Table 10: Final design parameters
Finger Geometries (mm)
Diameter = 0.5mm, Length = 12mm
Finger Material
High Carbon Steel, Stainless Steel
Base Geometry (mm)
5x5x2
Base Material
Aluminum 2024 or Steel 12L14

For the first iteration, we used the P-887.90 piezoelectric actuator to excite the fingers. The P-887.90 has a nominal displacement 32 μm and a resonant frequency 40 kHz. The results of the first test can be found below.

Table 11: Results of base materials in harmonic testing
Aluminum 2024
Steel 12L14
Max. Deformation (m)
4.3264e-5
4.5045e-5

The results from the first harmonic test show two important conclusions. First, the P-887.90 actuator provides too little displacement to excite the fingers. Second, the steel 12L14 material better transfers the vibrations to the fingers because it arrived at a higher deformation. Therefore, Steel 12L14 should be used in the final design. For the next test, we will try the P-007.40 linear actuator because it has a nominal displacement of 60 μm and a resonant frequency of 20 kHz. The results of the second harmonic test can be seen below.


click thumbnail for enlarged photo

Once again, the actuator is too small to produce enough deformation (0.2 mm) for effective performance. We will move up to an even larger actuator with the P-010.80 actuator which features 120 μm of nominal displacement and a resonant frequency of 10 kHz.


click thumbnail for enlarged photo

The 3rd harmonic analysis showed some promising results. From a piezoelectric actuator that provides a nominal displacement of 120 μm, the design shows a maximum deformation of 0.4 mm. This allows as a 0.8 mm bite into a blood clot which could be enough to destroy it. Look below for a flash video of the technical analysis of our design.


Get the Flash Player to see this player.
Press PLAY to watch video of our design in action

After comprehensively examining theoretical geometries and designs we had to think about how to check that our design would not harm the patient. Although theoretically it should not injure the patient, we wanted to think about the real world case. Fatal complications can arise from damaging the walls of the vessel and in order to make sure that our device will not cause a rupture, sensors will be used to monitor the force around the device. A product called PressureX will be used to determine how much pressure would be exerted by contact between the device and the vessel wall. PressureX is a thin film pressure sensor. The film contains a layer of microcapsules that are designed to break after a certain pressure. The capsules release a magenta ink that dyes the film. Based on the intensity of the color one can deduce, using a chart given by the company, the pressure being exerted at that point.

In order to gain more accurate readings the company offers to scan the film and use a computer program to determine the exact pressure, +/- 2%, or they sell a device to read the film. The device, PointScan, is a Windows-based application that senses the intensity of the color and immediately displays the pressure. The team will use this device to gain an accurate reading of the force being exerted on the macro model wall.

Testing Apparatus

With the final concept design of the actual vibrating tip itself complete further design was encompassed on the handle and casing of the actuator and the proposed testing set-up. First, the casing was designed to provide a shell to protect the actuator as well give the tester an easier experience in handling the vibrating tip. The casing is a simple two piece model that allows for appropriate fittings of the actuator and it’s according wiring. There is then a tip connector that attaches the actuator to the tip. (Drawings attached in Appendices).


click thumbnail for enlarged photo

The two pieces are created from a plastic. We chose polyethylene. The entire assembly looks thusly.


click thumbnail for enlarged photo

Further explanation of the testing is required to understand the various components necessary for purchase. The entire device is designed to be attached to a ring stand. The device is designed to be clamped down as to not affect the input frequency by human tampering. The vibrating tips are then placed at a level where they are able to be inserted into a synthetic clot placed within a test tube. The pictured tube is the approximate size of the test tube we would like to use in our testing (approximately 10x75mm). The actuator is controlled by a signal generator and an amplifier.